Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Humor Blogs -> Lowering the Bar
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Law Humor
: Lowering the BarCourt Dismisses Claim Alleging That Plaintiff Had Less Fun As Brunette
By Kevin Underhill
A judge in Connecticut has granted summary judgment in favor of L'Oreal, dismissing the claims of a woman who alleged emotional distress due to becoming a brunette.
Charlotte Feeney claimed that she bought a tube of permanent hair color in 2003 to touch up her naturally blonde hair. Only after a friend had applied the hair color, she said, did she realize to her horror that she had become a brunette. "I was mentally and physically in shock," Feeney said in an affidavit. "I was sick to my stomach, I had headaches, I don't like myself, I stay home more than ever in my life, I wear hats most of the time." She said that eventually she was forced to seek treatment for the coloration-induced trauma and depression.
Feeney specifically claimed that she had been damaged emotionally by the fact that she was no longer able to live life as a blonde. "I can never go back to my natural blonde hair," she said, which is true unless it were to, say, grow back. "Also," she continued, "blondes do get more attention than brunettes, of course, emotionally, I miss that." Well, you're getting more attention now, on the Internet, at least -- problem solved?
L'Oreal argued (and the judge agreed) that Feeney had been able to offer no evidence that the wrong color dye was in the tube she bought, as she claimed; nor had she explained why she and her friend did not first test the dye on some hair strands, as the package suggests. The judge also rejected Feeney's argument that the defendant had a duty to put a warning on every container of dye saying that it may not actually contain the color indicated; in other words, a label warning that the other label may not be accurate.
I would be willing to support this idea of a label warning label, but only if it were also accompanied by a label-warning-label warning, warning that the label warning label itself may not be accurate so that consumers may want to read the original label. But I would not support a label-warning-label-warning-label warning, because that's just getting ridiculous.
Link: Connecticut Post
Full post as published by Lowering the Bar on October 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Ladder Accident Injury Claims
Were you or a loved one injured in a ladder accident?
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
AIG Settles Injury Claim
for $18 Million
Failure-to-accommodate claim yields $1.82M award
$1.82 Million Awarded in Employment Lawsuit
Recovery Claim
Florida Insurance Guarantee Association agrees to pay $14 million settlement to Home Solutions of America for construction services.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Court dismisses antitrust complaint, then allows discovery
Court Dismisses Free Exercise Challenge To Civil Commitment After Marijuana Charge
Court Dismisses Claim Against US Over Local School Practices
Judge Dismisses Defamation Claim Based On "American Gangster"
"Judge dismisses case of woman who says veil cost her claim"







