Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyAmicus Brief in Support of Cert. in Tobacco Master Settlement Case
By Todd Zywicki
I was pleased, along with Josh Wright and several other antitrust scholars, to submit an amicus brief in support of cert. in the Tobacco Master Settlement Case. We argue that the state action exception to the antitrust laws should not be extended to cover a multistate government-created cartel such as this one. We also survey the appalling antitrust economics of the pact?according to one recent study, although the MSA agreement resulted in a tax increase of about 44 cents per pack of cigarettes, cigarette prices rose over a dollar per pack. It also carves up the market and essentially provides fixed market shares for the incumbent big tobacco companies, who working together with plaintiff?s lawyers and state AG?s have created and enforced a nationwide cartel.
Another amicus brief was filed in the case by Alan Morrison, Richard Epstein, and Kathleen Sullivan, challenging the multistate agreement under the Compact Clause of the Constitution. An article in Forbes calls this pairing of Morrison and Epstein an ?Odd Couple? pairing. I hope that the Supreme Court will recognize that if lawyers as diverse as Morrison, Epstein, and Sullivan recognize how much the MSA stinks, it will take cert and review the case.
Delving deeply into this case in connection with writing this amicus brief I was really just stunned at how grotesque the MSA is. I really do hope that the Supreme Court takes cert. to take a look at this thing and eventually overturns it. The Court has never before extended the state action doctrine to allow government to work together with private industry to create an interstate cartel. We argue in the brief that even if a state can be permitted to enact anticompetitive laws under Parker v. Brown, the logic of that case itself rests on a logic of competitive federalism and that, in turn, necessitates that the anticompetitive law?s effects end at the state line.
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on December 20, 2010 (boomark / email).
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
Child Support Overview
Federal requires states to set guidelines for support.
Child Support Orders
How to modify terms
Child Support
Disputing Paternity
Missing Children
Databases and organizations
Smokeless Tobacco Increases Risk of Stroke and Heart Attack
Smokeless Tobacco Increases Risk of Stroke and Heart Attack
Philip Morris
Jury Decides Against Big Tobacco
Sperm Donor
Ordered to Pay Child Support
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Facing Potential Class Action
Family Law
involving divorce, child custody, spousal support, common law, adoption and same sex marriage.
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support

Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Tobacco Master Settlement Case
Amicus Brief - Cert Petition: Legislative Jurisdiction/Extraterritoriality
Wanted: Law Professors To Sign On To SCOTUS Amicus Brief
Master & Settlement: Tobacco foes want even more money
Master & Settlement: General Tobacco sues AGs, competitors
Master & Settlement: Coughing at the 10th anniversary









