Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyCourt Clerk-in-Chief
By Jonathan H. Adler
In response to political blowback over the Administration?s decision to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in New York City, President Obama has decided to become personally involved in determining where KSM should be tried. The Washington Post reports:
President Obama is planning to insert himself into the debate about where to try the accused mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, three administration officials said Thursday, signaling a recognition that the administration had mishandled the process and triggered a political backlash.
Obama initially had asked Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to choose the site of the trial in an effort to maintain an independent Justice Department. But the White House has been taken aback by the intense criticism from political opponents and local officials of Holder?s decision to try Khalid Sheik Mohammed in a civilian courtroom in New York. . . .
Administration officials said the president?s involvement has to do with securing congressional funding for the costly trial before bipartisan efforts to strip financing for the case against Mohammed and four alleged co-conspirators gain greater momentum. They said it was a matter of national security, not just politics.
Senior White House officials said that the decision to try Mohammed in New York was Holder?s and that no single person in the administration was responsible for handling the politics of that choice. In an effort to avoid leaks, Holder kept the decision close in the days leading up to his Nov. 13 news conference, calling New York officeholders that day to inform them. Several New York officials said they have dealt exclusively with Holder, first during the rollout of the announcement and more recently as he struggles to find another venue. . . .
Obama gave little clue about how the administration will proceed when he was asked Sunday about the trial. But he made clear that, in a shift from last year, he is now part of the decision-making process, saying in a CBS interview that Manhattan was still an option. ?I have not ruled it out,? Obama said.
Like former Bush Justice Department offiicals James Comey and Jack Goldsmith, I think some of the criticisms of the Obama Administration?s decision to try KSM in a civilian court are overblown. If trying KSM in New York City is substantially more expensive that potential alternative venues, however, I think it reasonable to move the trial elsewhere. But I question whether it is politically advisable for the President to assume such direct responsiblity for the trial?s location.
Copyright © 2010
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:
)
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on February 13, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Wal-Mart
Avoids Criminal Charges over Clerk's Death
Fire Chief Whistleblower
City of DuPont agrees to $72,000 resignation and severance settlement.
Suspended and Fired
Town of Alton agrees to pay former police chief $10,000 wrongful termination settlement.
Police Chief Whistleblower
Argentine Township agrees to pay former employee $650,000 harassment and retaliation settlement.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation

Empirical Evidence of Clerk Partisanship and Influence on SCOTUS Decision Making Presented
Tribute to The Chief: A Clerks Memories of the Right Honourable Antonio Lamer







