ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> TalkLeft

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: TalkLeft

Judge Who Closed Courthouse Doors Faces Discipline

By TChris

ADVERTISEMENTS

You may recall the shameful work of Judge Sharon Keller, the appellate judge in Texas who (without consulting her colleagues) refused to keep the courthouse doors open for 20 minutes past closing time to accept a petition for a stay of execution. The stay request was based on the Supreme Court's decision to consider the constitutionality of executions carried out by lethal injection. The Supreme Court granted a stay request to a different Texas inmate two days later, but Michael Richards wasn't so lucky. Thanks to Judge Keller, he was killed without having a chance to have his stay request heard.

In addition to being condemned by lawyers and her judicial colleagues, Judge Keller's outrageous behavior caught the attention of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, which brought five charges against her. [more ...]

They included a “willing and persistent failure to follow [Court of Criminal Appeals] execution-day procedures” and a denial of an “open court or the right to heard according to law.” In perhaps the most damning professional charge yet, the commission found that Judge Keller’s actions “[casted] public discredit on the judiciary.”

If the Commission (after a public hearing) determines that the charges have merit, it can either censure the judge or recommend that the Texas Supreme Court remove her from office.

While private hearings with the Commission of Judicial Conduct are the norm in these cases, the executive director of the committee, Seana Willing, told the Dallas Morning News that a public hearing would provide the judge the “opportunity for due process, to cross-examine and confront witnesses” brought against her.

Judge Keller should be so lucky as to have the justice system work — at least for her. For all the anger at the judge’s actions, Texans can take pride in knowing that, whichever state entity decides her fate, she will be afforded the due process of law which every U.S. citizen is entitled to (and which she denied Richard).

Full post as published by TalkLeft on February 25, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/07/26 16:41:10)