Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyUnited States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (Year?)
By Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court will consider whether the Second Amendment should apply to the states, and thus whether to overrule United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876). Or is it United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)? Both citations are commonly used; HeinOnline reports that the 1875 date is given in roughly 60% of law review citations, and the 1876 in roughly 40%. Which is it?
Well, if you want to give the date of decision — which is the modern Bluebook requirement — you should say 1876, since the case was decided Mar. 27, 1876. The reason that many people say 1875 is that, to quote the Supreme Court’s Web page on the subject,
The dates of decisions do not appear beneath the case name in the first 107 volumes of the U.S. Reports. Beginning in 1854 (58 U.S.) the Lawyers’ Edition of the Supreme Court Reports includes the date, though there are some errors and omissions….Some dates do appear in the U.S. Reports, either in the margin or in the body of the opinion. One edition of a particular volume may have dates while another edition does not. These dates sometimes differ from the dates found in the [Engrossed Minutes of the Supreme Court].
Fortunately the page I just linked to contains the official publication dates, so if you want to include the year of decision, you may do so. And for Cruikshank, the year is 1876.
(Note that the characterization of the issue in McDonald as being whether to overrule Cruikshank is something of an oversimplification, but let’s go with it for now.)
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on September 30, 2009 (boomark / email).
Recall of TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count Sold in The United States and Puerto Rico
TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count One Lot Recalled in US and Puerto Rico
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
Cilantro
Recalled in 5 States
Lettuce
Recalled in 29 States due to Salmonella
82 Year Old
Awarded $6 Million in SJS Lawsuit
Salmonella Outbreak
50 People Sick in Five States

Hall and Harris on The Story of U.S. v. Cruikshank
FL2: Triggering event not required in anticipatory warrant if it occurs before search
Interesting discussion on Cruikshank and 14th Amendment
Refusing To Relinquish Poor Precedent
Overrule Cruikshank, not Slaughter-House
Pres. Bush submits $3 trillion budget. See what it contains.
Changed My Mind Moving Back to the United States from Abroad









