Legal Journals

Robertson on Transnational Litigation and Institutional Choice

By Gilles Cuniberti

Cassandra Burke Robertson, who is an associate professor at Case Western University School of Law, has published Transnational Litigation and Institutional Choice in the last issue of the Boston Law Review. The abstract reads:

When U.S. corporations cause harm abroad, should foreign plaintiffs be allowed to sue in the United States? Federal courts are in-creasingly saying no. The courts have expanded the doctrines of forum non conveniens and prudential standing to dismiss a growing number of transnational cases. This restriction of court access has sparked considerable tension in international relations, as a number of other nations view such dismissals as an attempt to insulate U.S. corporations from liability. A growing number of countries have responded by enacting retaliatory leg-islation that may ultimately harm U.S. interests. This Article argues that the judiciary?s restriction of access to federal courts ignores important foreign relations, trade, and regulatory considerations. The Article applies institutional choice theory to recommend a process by which the three branches of government can work together to establish a more coherent court-access policy for transnational cases.

It can be freely downloaded here.

Related posts:

1. Transnational Tort Litigation as a Trade and Investment Issue Alan O. Sykes (Stanford Law School) has posted “Transnational Tort...
2. Book: Transnational Litigation A new book offers an Irish perspective on international and...
3. Conference: The Future of Transnational Litigation The Future of Transnational Litigation Conference will be taking place...

Full post as published by Conflict of Laws on September 30, 2010 (boomark / email).