ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Do Criminal Charges Await Lehman Crew?

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

fuldSo now that we’ve digested the, uh, entire 2,200 page report by Lehman Brothers, where, exactly are we? Are we going to see former chief executive Dick Fuld (pictured) in cuffs? Former CFO Erin Callan working the chain gang?

It’s possible, but far from a slam dunk, legal experts told us today. Click here for our story on the situation.

The backstory, again (click here for our link from earlier Friday on the news): The 2,200-page report contains numerous accusations that Lehman executives repeatedly overlooked accounting irregularities and manipulated Lehman’s balance sheet.

The report also includes evidence that suggests senior executives, including Fuld, knew that Lehman was taking such actions. (In response to the report, Fuld’s lawyer, Allen & Overy’s Patricia Hynes, said, “Mr. Fuld did not know what those transactions were-he didn’t structure or negotiate them, nor was he aware of their accounting treatment.”)

So are criminal charges forthcoming? Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn and Manhattan are investigating the situation. But experts say securities-fraud convictions against executives in these situations can be difficult, largely because the law requires prosecutors to prove criminal intent.

Convictions do happen, of course (See, e.g., Skilling, Lay, Ebbers and a father-son team named Rigas). But to bring a successful criminal case, says Samuel Buell, a former federal prosecutor and law professor at WashU, there’s a little thing called intent. That is, prosecutors generally have to show that an executive both knew about irregularities and intended to mislead investors.

Buell says that senior executives criminally charged under the federal securities laws often bring up two defenses that can be hard for prosecutors to combat: that the key decisions were made “many floors beneath them,” and that they relied on the advice of professional advisers. “The executives say ‘I’m not a lawyer, I’m not an accountant,’ ” Buell says. “It can be hard to prove intent when this defense gets used.”

Okay, fine. But won’t prosecutors feel overwhelming pressure to file charges? One former federal prosecutor whose firm is involved in the Lehman case says it’s possible. “Unfortunately, it happens,” he says. “Prosecutors aren’t immune from that kind of pressure.”

Dan Richman, a law professor at Columbia, has higher hopes for the offices presiding over the Lehman case. “I’d like to think the professionalism of the offices looking at the case would be immune from such pressures.”

Photo: AP


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on March 12, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/07/26 00:07:20)