ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Frozen Out? Court Rejects Appeal by Rep. William Jefferson

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

williamjefferson_art_200h_20081112170105.jpg

U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, D-LA, listens to a question after beating runoff opponent Helena Moreno for the 2nd Congressional District seat he has held for nine terms in New Orleans, Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2008. (AP/Ann Heisenfelt)

Rep. William Jefferson faces the following conundrum: He’s accused of bribery, racketeering and other charges as part of an alleged involving payments to family controlled businesses in return for his help winning contracts, mostly in Western Africa. (Our favorite detail: investigators reportedly found $90,000 in cash in Jefferson’s home freezer). And now this: Today, in a written opinion, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals refused Jefferson’s request to throw out most of the 16 corruption charges, setting the stage for a trial in 2009. Here’s a report from the Times-Picayune.

According to the opinion, written by Judge Robert King, Jefferson contended that the grand jury was improperly presented with evidence of his legislative acts and that such evidence was relevant to its decision to indict. “He asserts that the Indictment thus contravenes the legislative immunity provided to him by the Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution . . .and must be dismissed,” wrote the court. Specifically, Jefferson was concerned that the grand jury may have considered evidence from Brett Pfeffer, a former Jefferson staffer who had pleaded guilty to related charges and was cooperating with the prosecution. Jefferson, wrote the court, thus suspected that evidence of his privileged legislative acts had been presented to the grand jury.

But the court said that even if the grand jury that indicted him heard testimony about Jefferson’s congressional activities, in possible violation of the Speech or Debate clause of the Constitution, that isn’t sufficient to overturn most of the federal criminal indictment against him.

“The principle of grand jury independence is firmly rooted and jealously protected in our federal system of justice,” concluded Judge King. “Because it is an independent investigative body, the federal courts have consistently accorded a grand jury ‘wide latitude.’”

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on November 12, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/07/26 11:30:59)