Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> ACLU Newsroom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: ACLU NewsroomHuman Rights Commission Finds "Probable Cause" That CVS Application Form Is Discriminatory
By ACLU
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org
Responding to a complaint filed by the Rhode Island ACLU at the end of 2009, the R.I. Commission for Human Rights has issued a finding that there is "probable cause" to believe that a job application form used by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. for various customer service positions violates state anti-discrimination laws that bar employers from eliciting information that pertain to job applicants' mental or physical disabilities.
CVS utilizes an online job application process for many of its positions. One component of that process requires applicants to complete statements about "attitudes and experiences." Specifically, applicants must indicate whether they "strongly disagree, disagree, agree, or strongly agree" with about 100 "attitudinal" statements. Among the statements applicants must respond to are:
- "You change from happy to sad without any reason."
- "You get angry more often than nervous."
- "Your moods are steady from day to day."
- "There's no use having close friends; they always let you down."
Although employers may legally ask questions designed to help determine an applicant's personality or aptitude for a job, the complaint argues that the questions listed above and similar ones "could be used to seek information about an applicant's mental health, or could have the effect of discriminating against applicants with certain mental impairments or disorders, and go beyond merely measuring general personality traits." The complaint, filed by RI ACLU cooperating attorney Christopher Corbett, notes that an employer's reliance on answers to those questions could have an impact on individuals with such illnesses as depression, ADHD, social anxiety, and other affective disorders.
As a result of the Commission's finding, which was received this week, the parties may seek a "right to sue" letter from the Commission and proceed to court or elect to have the Commission continue its investigation for a final determination.
ACLU attorney Corbett said today: "This questionnaire can easily serve to discourage qualified applicants from seeking employment with CVS. In today's job market, the last thing people need is to worry about being screened out of a job because of answers to inappropriately invasive questions. In light of the Commission's finding, I am hopeful that CVS will reconsider its position."
Full post as published by ACLU Newsroom on February 10, 2011 (boomark / email).
Baseball Players Named in Mitchell Report
Major League Baseball Players using Performance Enhancing Drugs
Visa Applications For Foreign Nationals Married to American Citizens
two options for getting your foreign-born spouse a visa
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
US Federal Government
allegedly violated the niversal Declaration of Human Rights by deporting undocumented parents of US born children.
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
Citizenship and Immigration Canada
allegedly overcharged for immigration application fees.
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
FDA
Life-Threatening Complications Associated with Recombinant Human Bone Graft Products

Bringing a case against Arizona before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Kentucky Human Rights Commission issues Rulings for June
Ky. Commission on Human Rights Issues Latest Rulings
Record of Offences under the Ontario Human Rights Code
New Zealand tribunal finds first-ever violation of Bill of Rights Act








