ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Huntsman Deal: Apollo Could Face Huge Damages as Banks Walk

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS
leonblack_blog_v_20081103085405.jpg

(AP/Jennifer Graylock)

Private equity firm Apollo has found itself in an interesting bind: It must consummate its $6.5 billion acquisition of Huntsman Corp., yet it no longer has the backing of the banks that originally agreed to fund the deal.

Here’s the story from our own Peter Lattman, and here’s how Apollo got into this mess. In July 2007, as the credit crunch was being born, Hexion — an Apollo-owned chemicals company based in Ohio — struck a deal to buy Huntsman. Then, a year later, Apollo sued Huntsman, asking the Delaware Court of Chancery to kill the transaction because a combined Hexion-Huntsman would be insolvent, which, Apollo claimed, would prevent the financing banks (Credit Suisse and Deutsche) from lending $15.35 billion to fund the deal. In September, Vice Chancellor Stephen Lamb refused to let Apollo — whose founder, Leon Black, is pictured above — walk away.

The latest: Last week, a New York State judge denied a request by Hexion to extend the banks’ lending commitment, meaning Apollo no longer has the backing of Credit Suisse and Deutsche. Meanwhile, the firm is under a separate court order in Delaware that admonishes it to use its best efforts to close the deal. If Apollo can’t close, it faces potentially billions of dollars of damage claims by Huntsman in both Delaware and Texas.

branstenJudge Eileen Bransten (pictured, right) ruled that Credit Suisse and Deutsche didn’t have to extend the length of their funding agreement, which was originally struck in July 2007, because it contractually expired Nov. 1. She pointed out that Hexion spent two recent months in Delaware trying to get out of the merger itself. Had it not spent that time, “it would not be where they are today, which is on the eve of the commitment letter expiring,” she said.

For more on how the troubled debt markets are hammering the buyout industry, click here for today’s NYT front-pager, which discusses Apollo’s troubled investments in Linens ‘n Things and Harrah’s Entertainment.

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on November 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0093 secs (from cache 11/07/26 11:51:11)