ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Las Vegas Federal Judge: Righthaven Wrong on Fair Use Argument

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

When last we checked in on this interesting little company called Righthaven, things were going rather swimmingly.

The company, which files copyright lawsuits chiefly on behalf of two publications, the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Denver Post, had just won a jurisdictional battle in a case and was continuing to file suits by the handful against bloggers and others for allegedly violating the newspapers’ copyrights.

But oh what a difference a season or two make.

The Las Vegas-based Righthaven suffered a significant loss on Friday when a federal judge in Las Vegas ruled that an Oregon nonprofit did not infringe on the Las Vegas Review-Journal’s copyrights when it posted without authorization an entire story from the newspaper on its Website. Click here for the story, from the Las Vegas Sun’s Steve Green, who has covered the Righthaven story from the beginning like white on rice.

According to Green’s story, on Friday, U.S. District Judge James Mahan said during a hearing that he planned to dismiss, on fair use grounds, a copyright infringement lawsuit filed against the Center for Intercultural Organizing (CIO), in Portland, Ore.

Mahan said the suit would be dismissed because the nonprofit used it in an educational way, that it didn’t try to use the story to raise money and because the story in question was primarily factual as opposed to being creative, wrote Green.

Interestingly, Mahan also criticized Righthaven’s approach, saying Righthaven’s use of the copyright for the lawsuit actually diminishes the copyright’s worth.

“Righthaven is not using the copyright the same way the R-J used it. Righthaven is using it to support a lawsuit,” Mahan said.

According to Green, it’s the second fair use defeat for Righthaven, though it’s arguably the more significant because it involved an entire story post rather than a partial story post.

Shawn Mangano, an attorney representing Righthaven, said Righthaven would appeal, just as it appealed the earlier fair use ruling. The Ninth Circuit has not yet ruled on the first ruling.

Finally, the money quote in this story came from Mahan, expressing absolutely no surprise in the fact that Righthaven planned to appeal. “I realize this is going to be appealed,” he said. “I tell litigators ‘that’s why God created San Francisco’” — home of the federal appeals court.


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on March 23, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/02/26 23:14:37)