ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Another Look at Obama?s More Liberal Lineup at the Justice Department

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

johnsenYesterday, news of Obama’s picks — which included Harvard’s Elena Kagan and Indiana University’s Dawn Johnsen — for four top spots at the DOJ raised the question of just how aggressive the new department will be in reshaping the last eight years of national-security policy.

Today, the WSJ’s Evan Perez and Jess Bravin address the question. They write that, with the nomination of Johnsen (pictured) to run the Office of Legal counsel, Obama “picked an outspoken critic of President George W. Bush over terrorist interrogations for a top Justice Department job, part of a liberal lineup at the department that is likely to overhaul national-security policy.”

Johnsen, who served in the office during the Clinton administration, has said she was “appalled” by memorandums that allowed what critics call torture of terror detainees, notes the WSJ. In comments in 2007 at a legal conference, she said: “The president of course is not above the law. Clearly what we need to do is restore OLC’s tradition of independence and integrity.”

The NYT adds that Johnsen, in a law review article last year, criticized the “unnecessary unilateralism of the Bush years” in programs like the National Security Agency’s program of wiretapping without warrants and the administration’s approval of simulated drowning, or waterboarding, in the questioning of suspected Al Qaeda operatives.

As for Harvard Law School’s dean, Elena Kagan, the nominee for solicitor general, the WSJ reports that she’ll have to oversee pursuit of the Bush administration’s contentious legal positions — and may modify them, if the president-elect fulfills campaign expectations. The new administration won’t drop all Bush arguments, particularly on routine matters, “but where the direction of the country is at stake,” change is likely, said Laurence Tribe, a Harvard law professor who taught both Obama and Kagan.

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on January 06, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.003 secs (from cache 11/07/26 10:12:11)