Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Law Blog - WSJ.comSecurities-Fraud Plaintiffs Get Rare Win at Supreme Court
By Nathan Koppel
Plaintiffs lawyers who specialize in securities cases typically don’t have a lot of praise to heap on the current Supreme Court.
But the court today ruled 9-0 in favor of plaintiffs on an issue central to securities litigation: when must a company publicly disclose adverse news about one of its products.
Matrixx Initiatives, the defendant in the case and the maker of Zicam Cold Remedy, argued in favor of a bright-line rule that a company need not disclose an adverse event unless there is a sufficient number of such events to establish a “statistically significant” risk.
The court rejected that view. In an opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the court reaffirmed one of its earlier rulings that the duty to disclose hinges instead on whether a reasonable investor would regard an omitted fact as a significant part of the “total mix” of information that affects a decision on whether to trade stock.
At issue in the securities class action was a claim that Matrixx failed to disclose that some users of Zicam nasal gel and swabs reportedly lost their sense of smell. (Click here for an earlier Law Blog post on the case.)
The plaintiffs alleged that Matrixx received at least a dozen incident reports about Zicam between 1999 and 2003 that concerned the loss of smell, but didn't disclose them and continued to make positive statements about the over-the-counter drug.
Matrixx said the reports weren't statistically significant and didn't indicate a causal relationship between the drug and the users' adverse reactions. It said there is no valid evidence that Zicam Cold Remedy products are unsafe.
Here’s a Washington Post article on the Supreme Court ruling.
“Sometimes information can be very important to an investor, whether or not it reaches the level of pure scientific statistical significance,” said Paul Geller, a partner with the winning firm, Robbins Geller.
Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on March 22, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
How to Skirt H-1B Regulations
Senator reacts to YouTube video
Jewelry Television
alleging treated gemstones were advertised as "extremely rare" and "all natural".
Nationwide Mutual
305,000 Potential Plaintiffs in Class Action
Tulsa County Natural Gas Royalties
Plaintiffs Awarded $126 Million
Brent Lemons
$1.3 million settlement in securities fraud lawsuit.
Securities Fraud
TOP Ships agrees to $1.2 million shareholder class action settlement.
Securities Settlement
GMH Trust Securities to pay $8.75 million in pending class action suit.

SCOTUS Curtails F-cubed Securities Litigation
Supreme Court Grants Cert in "Inquiry Notice" Statute of Limitations Case
Supreme Court Limits Securities Fraud Suits
U.S. Supreme Court declines to expand securities fraud liability
U.S. Supreme Court favors plaintiffs on securities fraud statute of limitations









