Legal Niches

Atkinson on Violent Games: You Don?t Need to Impale People

By pete_gallagher

In light of Australia's refusal to classify Sega's PC game Aliens vs. Predator, the country's ABC News outlet ran a short video piece on the controversy with comments from everyone's favorite Attorney General, Michael Atkinson.

The report quickly covers the Aliens vs. Predator story, noting that the game's developer, Rebellion, will not edit the game in order to appease censors.

Gary Farrow, cast as a typical gamer, was asked about the  lack of an R18+ rating in Australia. The 42-year old offered, 'We're talking about just labeling content, so we have a fairly educated idea as to what to expect [from a game].

Atkinson's comments on calls for an adult videogame rating:

This is a question of a small number of very zealous gamers trying to impose their will on society. And I think harm society. It's the public interest versus the small vested interest.

Atkinson on violence in games:

I accept that 98%, 99% of gamers will tell the difference between fantasy and reality, but the 1% to 2% could go on to be motivated by these games to commit horrible acts of violence.

You don't need to be playing a game in which you impale, decapitate and dismember people.

Australia's Interactive Games and Entertainment Association (IGEA) CEO Ron Curry was also interviewed in order to counter some of Atkinson's remarks. He stated:

It doesn't seem democratic that a single attorney general should be able to dictate what the vast Australian population can interact with.

The government trusts us to be adults with films, but they only want us to be children with games.

Thanks Ryan!

Full post as published by GamePolitics.com on December 10, 2009 (boomark / email).