ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: Slaw.ca

Proving Age on the Internet

By John Gregory

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Supreme Court of Canada today upheld the Alberta Court of Appeal, which had convicted a person of Internet luring of an underage person — though the person in question was a police officer posing as a 13-year-old: R. v. Levigne 2010 SCC 25

The Criminal Code s.172.1 presumes that a person being lured is under 18 unless the accused person has reason to believe that the target person is at least 18, and the accused has the burden of taking ‘reasonable steps’ to find out how old the person is.

In this case, the target’s profile in the chat room said 18, but in early chat he said he was only 13. The accused took no other steps to determine the real age — and how persuasive would they have been in the face of a direct statement of age?

But for other cases: what might constitute reasonable steps to determine someone’s age online? This question comes up not only to avoid criminal charges, of course, but also to demonstrate age of consent to contracts, possibly to order certain products online like tobacco or alcohol, or to consent to the collection of personal information.

What is done under the Child Online Protection of Privacy Act in the US, where personal information may not be collected from people under 13 without parental consent?

Would it make a difference if one was taking these reasonable steps in a criminal or civil context? The Criminal Code does not impose liability if one has taken reasonable steps, whatever they are (so long as one can claim a reasonable belief as a result?). I would not think that reasonable steps alone would be good enough to make a civil contract enforceable against a minor, or to excuse the sale of ‘adult’ goods to such a person.

Do you agree? What should your clients be doing in such circumstances? (I do not suggest that your clients come to you for advice about how to lure under-age people for sexual purposes ?but for the more general question?)

Full post as published by Slaw.ca on July 15, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/06/26 16:38:16)