ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Writing Blogs -> Triangle Grammar Guide

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Writing

: Triangle Grammar Guide

Words for our times

By Pam_Nelson

ADVERTISEMENTS

Here is an entry in the 2008 Associated Press Stylebook:

outsourcing A business practice used by companies to reduce costs by transferring work previously performed in-house to outside suppliers.

I am reading a book (review to come when I finish) about words that have come into English from other languages. I am struck by how the author shows the connection between what was going on in the world and what words entered the language. The Associated Press Stylebook shows the changes in the language, too.

The 1996 version of the stylebook appears to be the first one that had entries for Internet and World Wide Web; the 2000 version had a separate section, printed on gray paper, that defined and set style for various terms associated with the Internet and computers: baud, e-mail and emoticon, for example. In the 2008 version, as it has been for several years, Internet and computer terms are not listed separately.

The 2008 version has entries on social networking, podcast and wiki, among others. The 1977 version had Viet Cong, Solid South and Common Market. It has gizmo, an entry no longer in the stylebook, presumably because it's in dictionaries.

Before 2000, the AP used courtesy titles for women, but not men, in news stories. The 1977 version did allow Ms. As I recall, that was the first mention of Ms. in the stylebook. I don't have any older versions than 1977. (I had a stylebook for my first year in the business, 1976, but I must have left it behind when I left my first newspaper, the Hickory Daily Record, in 1979.)

Here is one difference worth noting from the 1977 edition: kids. In a separate entry in 1977, we were told, "Use children unless you are talking about goats, or the use of kids as an informal synonym for children is appropriate in the context." In this year's edition, as it has been, we find no separate entry for kids, but under the children entry, we find "Avoid kids as an a universal synonym, unless the tone of the story dictates less formal usage." I would say that rule is universally flouted.

Full post as published by Triangle Grammar Guide on July 26, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/02/26 11:24:43)