ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> California Civil Litigation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: California Civil Litigation

Hughes v. Pair - Part I

ADVERTISEMENTS
The Facts and The HoldingHughes v. Pair (Sept. 10, 2007, B194307, Second District)23 p. opinion (19 p. majority, 4 p. dissent)UPDATE: REVIEW GRANTED (The Supreme Court granted review on Nov. 28, 2007) (S157197)This is a problematic decision. I don't like to criticize the Court of Appeal, but in this decision I think that it missed a crucial distinction between employment sexual harassment actions under the FEHA and Title VII and the action created by Civil Code section 51.9. It appears that the read more

To access this complete feed in the blog feed reader login or register for free.

Full post as published by California Civil Litigation on October 01, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/03/26 03:09:35)