Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How AppealingThree-judge Ninth Circuit panel divides over whether the offense of indecent exposure is categorically a crime of moral turpitude under California law
Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote the majority opinion, in which Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr. joined, holding that the offense of indecent exposure is not categorically a crime of moral turpitude under California law. Circuit Judge Jay S. Bybee issued a lengthy dissenting opinion.
Full post as published by How Appealing on February 10, 2010 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Missing Children
Databases and organizations
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Law & Order Depicts Police Procedures and Criminal Justice
Accuracy of Criminal Justice Depiction on Television
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Darvocet
FDA Expert Panel Votes for Ban
Insignia
26-Inch Flat-Panel LCD TVs Recalled
Gulf War Syndrome
Panel Confirms it's Real, and Identifies Causes

Nunez v. Holder (9th Cir. - Feb. 10, 2010)
Ninth Circuit Finds Counterfeiting Constitutes Crime of Moral Turpitude









