Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Local Law Blogs Blogs -> Louisiana Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Local Law Blogs
: Louisiana Law BlogKeeping Up With Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Regulations
Several developments concerning the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) regulations occurred in 2006 and 2007. Thoughtful planning and continued tracking of these developments will be necessary to ensure compliance.
EPA revised the SPCC plan requirements in 2006 to:
- Provide the option to self-certify SPCC Plans in lieu of review and certification by a Professional Engineer for facilities that have an aboveground oil storage capacity of 10,000 gallons or less and meet other qualifying criteria.
- Provide an alternative to the general secondary containment requirement without requiring a determination of impracticability for qualified oil-filled operational equipment.
- Define and exempt particular vehicle fuel tanks and other on-board bulk oil storage containers (called motive power containers).
- Exempt mobile refuelers from the sized secondary containment requirements for bulk storage containers.
- Remove SPCC requirements for animal fats and vegetable oils for certain types of facilities.
- Extend the SPCC compliance dates for farms.
A final rule in 2007 extends the compliance dates for owners and operators of facilities to prepare or amend and implement SPCC Plans in accordance with both prior 2002 amendments and the 2006 amendments until July 1, 2009 (72 Fed. Reg. 27443).
The purpose of the extension is to allow the owner or operator time to prepare or amend and implement the SPCC Plan in accordance with the July 2002 (67 Fed. Reg. 47042, July 17, 2002) and December 2006 (71 Fed. Reg. 77266, December 26, 2006) amendments. A further purpose was to allow facilities to prepare for any subsequent modifications to the SPCC requirements that would result from additional substantive requirements that were anticipated to be proposed later in 2007. In fact, EPA did propose additional refinements to the rule in October 2007 (72 Fed. Reg. 58378, October 15, 2007).
The October 2007 proposed rule has numerous amendments. All SPCC-regulated facilities (not just oil production facilities) would be potentially affected by these proposals. EPA’s summary of the proposal states that the amendments will provide:
- clarity on the general secondary containment requirements;
- flexibility in the security requirements;
- flexibility in the use of industry standards to comply with integrity testing requirements;
- additional flexibility in meeting the facility diagram requirements; and
- clarity on the flexibility provided by the definition of “facility.”
In addition, the October 2007 proposal has amendments specific to oil production facilities that:
- exclude oil production facilities from the loading/unloading rack requirements;
- modify the definition of “production facility”, consistent with the proposed amendments to the definition of “facility”;
- extend the timeframe by which a new oil production facility must prepare and implement an SPCC Plan;
- exempt flow-through process vessels at oil production facilities from the sized secondary containment requirements, while maintaining general secondary containment requirements and requiring additional oil spill prevention measures;
- exempt flowlines and intra-facility gathering lines at oil production facilities from all secondary containment requirements, while establishing more specific oil spill prevention measures; and
- clarify the definition of “permanently closed” as it applies to an oil production facility.
Other proposed revisions to the SPCC rule included in the 2007 proposed rule relate specifically to farms and facilities handling animal fats and vegetable oils. The proposed rule can be viewed in its entirety here.
Full post as published by Louisiana Law Blog on June 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Ortho Evra Patch Risk
Ortho Evra Side Effects
Have you or a loved one suffered from Ortho Evra side effects?
Ortho Evra Side Effects
Alabama Restaurant Association Hires Legal Council to Help Members Damaged by BP Oil Spill
Alabama Restaurant Association Hires Legal Council to Help Members Damaged by BP Oil Spill>
Ford Recalls
alleging cruise control switches are defective.
Polaris All-Terrain Vehicles
Defective Electronic Control Modules
Mongoose Youth ATVs
Recalled By KYMCO Due to Loss of Speed Control
Mazda Motor Corp.
alleging defective speed control switches can lead to fires.
Newmont Mining
Settles Toxic Spill Class Action

Massachusetts Issues Comprehensive ID Theft Prevention Regulations & Executive Order
NYT: Weighing the Health Benefits of Birth Control
CDC Traumatic Brain Injury Webcast
SCOTUS Reduces Exxon Oil Spill Punitive Damages to Match Compensatory Damages
GAO Reports: Aboveground Oil Storage Tanks, DOD Health Care, Federal User Fees, Military Readiness







