ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Local Law Blogs Blogs -> New Jersey Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Local Law Blogs

: New Jersey Law Blog

A Panoramic Discussion of the Squeeze-Out Techniques Often Used By Majority Shareholders

ADVERTISEMENTS

The purpose of this blog entry is to provide a brief list of the squeeze-out techniques often used by majority shareholders in their effort to oppress minority shareholders. The list which follows is merely illustrates of some of the techniques I often encounter with regard to my representation of oppressed minority shareholders. Of course, this list is not exclusive. 
 

Generally, 'oppression has been defined as frustrating a shareholder's reasonable expectations.'  Brenner v. Berkowitz, 134 N.J. 488, 506 (1993) (citing, 2 O'Neil's Close Corporations § 9.29 at 132 (Callaghan & Co., 3rd ed. 1988)).  The following situations could constitute actionable unlawful 'oppression' where the majority:

has cut off the flow of income to the minority owner by refusing to declare dividends; terminated the employment of the minority or their family members; removed the minority from the board of directors; decided to award themselves (or their family members) exorbitant salaries and/or bonuses; diverted corporate assets to other corporations which are owned by the majority and not the minority; siphoned off corporate assets by entering into leases or loans with terms favorable to the majority while at the same time detrimental to the minority; refused to enforce contracts that are beneficial to the corporation because the enforcement of those contracts would be personally detrimental to the majority; withheld company information; embezzled company assets; and/or acted fraudulently towards the corporation, which, in turn affects the minority shareholder.

   
In blog articles to follow, I will go into greater detail as to the majority's use of the afore-described squeeze-out techniques along with how a minority shareholder may employ the law to fight back.

Full post as published by New Jersey Law Blog on February 27, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.004 secs (from cache 11/03/26 22:43:50)