ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> court-o-rama.org

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Miscellaneous

: court-o-rama.org

Traditional Family Earspin

By Anne Skove, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Thanksgiving often means spending time with family and honoring traditions. Our very notion of "family" is fraught with tradition. But would we recognize a traditional family if one invited us over?

Professor Stephanie Coontz has two things to say about this: one, our concepts about what constitutes traditional family are misguided (at best), and two, traditional families were nothing to write home about anyway.

In Coontz's hands, family myths shatter like plates against a wall during a nasty argument. Polygamy, lopsided divorce policies (e.g., men could, women couldn't), and the lack of property (or other) rights for women all made for not-so-happy days. Marriage was a business and/or political agreement between families. Do we miss that type of arrangement? (Uh, feel free not to answer!)

As for the separation of church and marriage, Coontz tells the story about a pope who wanted to decree that the only recognized marriages would be those which had taken place in a church. Some kind advisor whispered to him that this wouldn't be such a good idea, as the moment the plan went into effect the majority of children in Europe would be illegitimate.

In fact, Coontz says the real breakdown of the institution of marriage came when we destigmatized illegitimacy. So it's already come and gone. We got rid of illegitimacy laws and policies for good reason -- children shouldn't suffer for their parents' choices. Sometimes the good reasons come with bad side effects, such as a soaring divorce rate.

Why do people wax nostalgic for the 1950s? It's not the racism, the isolation of women to the home (many had worked throughout WWII), or the hairdos. Yet (we're told), many do long for the time when Richie and Potsie could hang out at Arnold's without fear of thugs (Fonzie wasn't really a thug) or societal evils.

The irony? Those who pine for the stability of postwar years refuse to re-institute the programs that made that stability possible. Citing expansive veterans' benefits, high taxes for the wealthy and corporations, home financing, affirmative action, and public works spending, Coontz argues handily that working-class people had real hope of advancement.

Whether you celebrated with hand-picked family, friends, neighbors, just your sweet self or a large group from the community, whether you had an 18-lb. turkey or tofu surprise, be ye pilgrim or native, court-o-rama wishes everyone a Happy Thanksgiving (or harvest festival of your choice)!

Full post as published by court-o-rama.org on November 27, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0026 secs (from cache 11/03/26 21:57:52)