Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousMenell: Patent Authority of the International Trade Commission
By Dennis Crouch
Berkeley Law School professor Peter Menell has published a new essay in the Patently-O Patent Law Journal that discusses the Section 337 authority of the International Trade Commission (ITC).
The ITC now conducts more full patent adjudications on an annual basis than any district court in the nation. The ITC's six Section 337 administrative law judges (ALJs) focus almost exclusively upon patent investigations, making the ITC the only specialized trial-level patent adjudication forum in the nation. Given the importance of international trade to high technology markets, the ability to exclude goods at the border provides a valuable strategic option for patent owners. Consequently, all patent litigators and in-house patent counsel should be familiar with the ITC's Section 337 authority. This article summarizes its key elements and calls attention to an upcoming conference ? The ITC Comes to Silicon Valley (May 18, 2010) in San Jose ? and the development of a comprehensive, up-to-date treatise: Section 337 Patent Investigation Management Guide. |
The essay also includes a useful table comparing differences in rights and procedures between district court patent adjudication and ITC patent investigations.
Documents:
- Read the Essay: Peter S. Menell, The International Trade Commission's Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79.
- Conference: The ITC Comes to Silicon Valley (May 18, 2010).
- ITC Guide: Section 337 Patent Investigation Management Guide.
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on May 11, 2010 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Grand River Dam Authority
Faces Class Action over Flood Damage
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.

Ajinomoto Co. v. International Trade Commission (Fed. Cir. 2010)
U.S. International Trade Commission Institutes Investigation Based Upon Flexsys Patent
Tim Lee on Menell on patent lawyers
Stay in Tessera case overturned by ITC; stock soars
At the ITC, Patent Litigation is Not a Domestic Industry
"Shifting strategies in patent law"








