Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Golf Patents
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Golf PatentsUS Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: "Irreconcilably Inconsistent Jury Verdicts" Results in Remand for a New Trial Regarding the Original ProV1 Patent Infringement Lawsuit
By David Dawsey PE Esq
Well, a new trial would be a nice economic stimulus package for everyone except the shareholders of Callaway and Fortune Brands! Perhaps I can go cover the new trial live for The Golf Channel; nah, I have a face for the radio.
David Dawsey - The IP Golf Guy
PS - Click HERE if you need a refresher on the case.
Full post as published by Golf Patents on August 14, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.
Underground Piping
Insituform Technologies awarded $4.5 million patent infringement settlement.

Lovenox Patent Case Back at Federal Circuit; Generic Versions Still Not Yet Approved
What Good is the Federal Circuit
National Patent Jury Instructions Released
Expert's internally inconsistent testimony could not support jury's infringement verdict
International Rectifier v. IXYS Corp.








