ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> InjuryBoard

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: InjuryBoard

Cardinals Immune From Flying Bat Injuries

By Jane Akre

ADVERTISEMENTS

Fans assume certain risks for injury when they attend a baseball game, this judge has ruled.

Crying Foul

LEARN MORE


 

IMAGE SOURCE: Wikimedia commons/ Keyspan Park/ author: Wally Gobetz

You go to the game expecting to see some baseball, enjoy the sunshine, and maybe a hot dog. You don't expect a bat in the face and a broken nose.

But that's what happened to Gerard Elie in July, 2002.

A season-ticket holder, Elie went to a pregame warm-up between the Brooklyn Cyclones and the Cardinals' New Jersey affiliate at Coney Island Keyspan Park.

Elie sat 15 feet from the third-base. His complaint says that a flying bat fractured his nose.

The player who threw the bat has been identified as outfielder, Joey Vandever, who was released by the Cardinals, two months before the suit was filed. He now works as a medical supply company sales rep.

How he threw the bat seems to be at issue.

Elie argued it was negligence, intentional, or reckless. Elie said he didn't assume that risk when he attended the game. The Cardinals say he did.

The court has sided with the team.

Because the player was "horsing around" and not engaged in actual batting practice when the bat went flying does not relieve those in attendance of an assumed risk. Every baseball fan who attends a game assumes some risk of injury from foul balls or bats, said the judge.

In granting the St. Louis Cardinals, LLC summary judgment, Supreme Court Justice Mark I. Partnow held, "Among the dangers to which a baseball spectator has consented to is the danger that a loose baseball bat will strike a spectator and cause injury," he said (see Elie v. City of New York, 20244/03.)

Elie's attorney, Dennis Matarangas of Bourhazos & Matarangas, says his client is a "true fan" who continues to attend Cyclones games.

The tort action against several other defendants, including the Cyclones, the City of New York and Vandever, remains ongoing, reports Law.com.

IB Partner, Greg Webb, reports that fragments from maple wood bats, have put fans in danger of injury. #

Originally posted at Jane Akre

Full post as published by InjuryBoard on September 04, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/03/26 05:47:32)