Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Des Moines Personal Injury Lawyer

Personal Injury Law

: Des Moines Personal Injury Lawyer

Raising Children in a Country where Hatred and Intolerance is Sometimes Institutionalized

By Steve Lombardi

No I'm not talking about Communist China, I'm talking about hatred and intolerance being taught in America.

I have to wonder how we expect to raise children to be part of a global economy with the idea it's okay to be an American that hates people whose ideas are different.

Hitler was perhaps the most proficient world leader in promoting hatred for a group of people, the Jews. So successful was his program of hatred that he convinced an entire nation that institutionalized murder was acceptable governmental policy. Think about that for a minute. That's an incredible feat. Persuading an entire nation of people to allow emotions to override rational thinking. How did Hitler persuade a nation to turn off their ability to reason in favor of allowing irrational emotions to march scores of men, women and children to human incinerators, when rational thinking should have stepped in and made them question what they were about to do.

Is it an answer that humans are no better than sheep being lead to slaughter?

And this brings me back to law schools that are under consideration for accredidation by the American Bar Association. I have to admit as a lawyer to being more than just concerned about that accredidation. Here are a few of my concerns.

1. Is the lawyer's oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution necessary to effectively practice law in the United States?

2. If all lawyers take an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution should those who lie to uphold it also be licensed to practice law?

3. If a person disagrees so vehemently with a an act considered to be constitutional that they would tacitly sanction murder, is it a stretch to believe that same person would lie while taking an oath to support the U.S. Constitution?

4. Is the ABA's Lawyer Oath to be taken seriously, if so why?

5. Should any institution that teaches subversion to the laws of the United States and the U.S. Constitution be accredited to teach students.

If a terrorist group, planning an attack on America's government planned on gaining entrance to the Pentagon through training sleeper-cell students, you would have no problem saying that organization should not be an accredited American educational institution.

If a law school existed that taught its students subversion of the U.S. Constitution and court system you would have no problem agreeing that the ABA should not be sanctioning a law school for legal terrorists.

If student terrorists lied in taking an oath that allowed a license to operate within the American court system you'd have no problem with banning them from practicing law because they are lying under oath to support our country's government.

But what if those institutions are teaching religious doctrine that advocates terrorism; a doctrine that allows or tactily approves killing of Americans to advance it's own regligious agenda.

Mind you I don't care if law schools teach students about hating the idea of abortion; that is their right, I just don't want the ABA sanctioning an insitution that teaches subversion to the laws of the United States of America. America was founded on the rule of law; that law by precedent is the foundation of the American way of life. It is the fabric by which the American Dream was created.

By sanctioning an institution that advocates lying under oath are we subverting the American dream.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkY_2GNvR6Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttsoxMWtTYQ

Tomorrow let's examine the woman who epitomizes hatred and intolerance in America. Meet me here tomorrow to examine the poster child for hatred and intolerance, a/k/a Hitler in drag, fraulein Coulter.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Steve Lombardi

Full post as published by Des Moines Personal Injury Lawyer on July 05, 2009 (boomark / email).