Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Podcasts Blogs -> InternetCases.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Podcasts
: InternetCases.comSetting up Outlook rule to intercept another?s email can be a federal crime
U.S. v. Szymuszkiewicz, — F.3d —, 2010 WL 3503506 (7th Cir. September 9, 2010)
Seventh Circuit upholds conviction of employee who secretly intercepted his boss’s email.
A federal jury convicted the defendant, who was an IRS revenue officer, of violating the Wiretap Act (or the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, as some like to call it — 18 USC 2511(1)(a). He had snuck onto his boss’s computer and set a rule in Microsoft Outlook to autoforward copies of all incoming email to his own account.
The defendant sought review of his conviction with the Seventh Circuit. On appeal, the court affirmed. Judge Easterbrook’s opinion is interesting reading. It is a nice accompaniment to the 2005 decision from the First Circuit in U.S. v. Councilman.
The court rejected the defendant’s argument that the Wiretap Act required that the “interception” of the email be “contemporaneous” with its transmission: “[d]ecisions articulating such a requirement are thinking football rather than the terms of the statute.” (Such decisions would include Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual (3d Cir.), Steve Jackson Games v. Secret Service (5th Cir.), Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines (9th Cir.) and United States v. Steiger (11th Cir).
In any event, the court found that the defendant’s interception of the messages in this case was “contemporaneous by any standard.” The evidence showed that the Outlook rules, though set within the email client, operated on the server. A message to the boss would go to an email server in Kansas City, and then be “flung across the network” as packets making up two copies, one for the boss and one for the defendant. It was this copying on the server that was the unlawful interception.
If you’re at all interested in this case and the Wiretap Act, then you must check out Orin Kerr’s post at the Volokh Conspiracy, especially the comments to that post. Very erudite discussion.
Full post as published by InternetCases.com on September 16, 2010 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Missing Children
Databases and organizations
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Utilities Whistleblower
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities agrees to $485,000 fine for setting up a private bank account.
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.
Computer Spyware Act
Spammer to pay $100,000 settlement in email fraud lawsuit.
Microsoft Spam
Richter pays $7 million settlement in deceptive email lawsuit.
Taylor Bean Faces Federal WARN Class Action
Taylor Bean Federal Employment Class Action Filed
Arrow Trucking Hit with Federal Lawsuit by Employees
Arrow Trucking Hit with Federal Lawsuit by Employees

Integrating LinkedIn With Outlook Email.
Creating Email Portfolios for Small EDD Productions
Microsoft Releases Official Outlook Forgotten Attachment Detector
"Get the Conversation Out of Email"
Chopping Through Your Email Inbox








