Politics

The Supreme Court's "Citizens United" Decision Threatens the 1964 Civil Rights Act

By Brendan Fischer

In Glenn Beck's ?Restoring Honor? rally last week, held on the anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.?s 1963 ?I Have a Dream? speech, Beck claimed that he and his Tea Party followers would ?take back the civil rights movement.? While King?s speech led Congress to pass the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act, Beck?s movement could lead to that Act?s abolishment. Although Beck has not publicly called for overturning the 20th century?s greatest piece of equality-advancing legislation, the libertarian philosophy he espouses is at odds with the way the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination by private businesses. While Beck did not clearly state how he would reclaim the civil rights movement (he asserted that his rally was nonpolitical and aimed at ?restoring America?s traditional values?) other leading libertarian conservatives have called for abolishing some of the Act?s most important elements, saying they constitute unnecessary government interference with the market. While undoing the Civil Rights Act through political channels would be almost impossible, the U.S. Supreme Court may have granted conservatives a means to do so through the judiciary. The Court?s reasoning in its January 2009 Citizens United decision could put some of the most important parts of the Civil Rights Act at risk.

read more

Full post as published by PR Watch on September 09, 2010 (boomark / email).