Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectGraham explains Kagan vote
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
Washington Times: "[I]t wasn't a total shocker that the 13-6 tally included a yes vote by a lone Republican - Sen. Lindsey Graham, who on occasion has reached across the partisan aisle to work with the majority. But what wasn't expected was the South Carolina lawmaker's unusually blunt explanation for his vote, saying he was obligated to support a 'qualified' Obama administration nominee because 'the last election had consequences.'"Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on July 21, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Graham to Support Kagan, Crossing Party Lines
Graham Signals Willingness to Support Kagan
"Senate Panel Backs Kagan Nomination, With One Republican Vote"
Senate Republicans Announce They Will Vote Against Kagan
Kagan Confirmed by Judiciary Senate Committee
GRAHAM: IMMIGRATION REFORM DEAD IN THE SENATE








