Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectGrassley votes no on Kagan nomination, says her answers were vague
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
Des Moines Register: "Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley voted against the nomination of Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, describing her testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee as evasive. 'Because she has no previous judicial experience, candid answers were essential for us to ascertain whether she has the appropriate judicial philosophy.'"Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on July 21, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Income Tax Changes for 2007
Get Answers to your Income Tax Questions
Lawsuits and Settlements
Darvocet
FDA Expert Panel Votes for Ban
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

"Senate Panel Backs Kagan Nomination, With One Republican Vote"
Senate Finance Committee Approves Geithner's Nomination, 18-5
More Senators Announce Votes on Kagan
Attempts to Defeat the Kagan Nomination, and Political Hardball
Kagan’s responses to senators’ written questions
Votes on Kagan, Cole Delayed a Week







