Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectThe Perils of the Fight Against Cognitive Illiberalism
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
Harvard Law Review: "Cognitive illiberalism bothers the authors not only because it might produce erroneous judicial conclusions of the type they think occurred in Scott but because, as they put it, it 'needlessly magnifies cultural conflict over and discontent with the law.' This paper questions the premise of the article, which is that opinions like Scott cause more than a ripple among the populace. Further, even if the authors? concern about the case?s effect on social cohesion is correct, this paper questions whether we should care, given the implications of the authors? analysis for judicial review and Fourth Amendment doctrine."Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on June 17, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Hurricane Ike
Gulf Coast Residents Fight for Compensation
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Whose Eyes are You Going to Believe
An Argument Against Cognitive-Enhancing Drugs
Cox, Gersen, Henderson, and Samaha on Cognitive Subsystems and the Law
Professionalism alert: The perils to lawyers (and their staff) who Tweet
Podcast on Cognitive Error as a Justification for Paternalism:







