Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause

Religion & Law

: Religion Clause

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

By Howard M. Friedman

In Moriarty v. Rendell, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37043 (MD PA, May 1, 2009), a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge refused to grant a temporary restraining order against prison officials who insist that plaintiff, as a condition of parole, attend a religious-based 12-step alcohol abuse treatment program. The court concluded that plaintiff had not suffered the irreparable harm required for injunctive relief.

In Dawson v. Burnette, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37729 (WD MI, May 4, 2009), a Michigan federal district judge adopted a magistrate's recommendations that a Buddhist prisoner be permitted to proceed with his 1st Amendment damage claim alleging that he was denied a vegan diet, but that his claims under RLUIPA be dismissed and his claims for declaratory and injunctive relief be dismissed as moot.

In Mitchell v. Hamlet, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37567 (ND CA, April 15, 2009), in a screening hearing, the court permitted plaintiff to proceed with his claims that he was denied a Halal diet, the ability to wear a beard, the ability to group-worship, the ability to use earned time to attend prayer services, and that he was limited to a single vendor in purchasing religious items. He also claims he was limited in the amount of prayer oils that he can order, and that no Muslim chaplain or large prayer rug is available to Muslim inmates.

In Boyd v. McGuire, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38026 (D NJ, May 5, 2009), a New Jersey federal district court permitted a Muslim jail inmate to proceed with his equal protection claim that Muslim prisoners receive only a vegetarian diet, while Jewish prisoners receive a kosher diet that includes meat. The court dismissed his 1st Amendment claim, but with leave to amend and refile. It also dismissed his claim for prospective injunctive relief because he was about to be transferred to a different facility.

In Davis v. Hawaii, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38091 (D HI, May 4, 2009), a Hawaii federal magistrate judge transferred venue to Arizona in a case alleging that a Hawaii prisoner incarcerated in Arizona was prevented him from practicing his Native Hawaiian religion.

Full post as published by Religion Clause on May 10, 2009 (boomark / email).