Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause

Religion & Law

: Religion Clause

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

By Howard M. Friedman

In Houseknecht v. Doe, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77950 (ED PA, Aug. 28, 2009), a Pennsylvania federal district court rejected an inmate's complaint that his rights under the Free Exercise Clause and RLUIPA were infringed when, because he was placed in protective custody, he was denied access to formal worship services and formal Bible study classes. He was instead permitted to meet with a chaplain. The court allowed plaintiff additional discovery on his retaliation claim.

In Sumahit v. Parker, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78973 (ED CA, Sept. 3, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge recommended rejection of a prisoner's free exercise claim, finding that he had not described how restrictions on his access to Native American religious services burdened his ability to practice his religion.

In Johnson v. Sisto, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78943 (ED CA, Sept. 2, 2009), a Rastafarian prisoner complained that he was denied access to a vegan diet as required by his Rastafarian faith. A California federal magistrate judge recommended that most of his claims be dismissed because the defendants he sued lacked authority to provide him with a religious diet unless he obtained a religious diet card through the chaplain. However the magistrate recommended that plaintiff be permitted to proceed on his claim that on one occasion, when he was entitled to it, he was denied a religious diet meal.

In Jackson v. Verdini, (MA App. Ct., Aug. 21, 2009), a Massachusetts state appeals court affirmed (with a minor modification) a lower court's holding that the Department of Corrections provide an additional Imam to perform weekly Jum'ah services and that female officers be prohibited from touching the genital or anal areas of any male Muslim inmates except in emergency situations.

In Sandeford v. Plummer, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79571 (ND CA, Sept. 1, 2009), a California federal district court allowed plaintiff to move ahead with free exercise and equal protection challenges. Plaintiff alleged that jail staff failed to grant his request for an "Islamic Diet," access to Islamic religious services, and permission to wear a Kufi cap.

In Kaiser v. Shipman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79413 (ND FL, Aug. 4, 2009), a Florida federal magistrate judge recommended dismissal of Free Exercise and RLUIPA claims by an inmate who was not permitted to keep in his personal possession tarot cars, an alter cloth and runes to practice his faith,which prison authorities classified as Wiccan.

In Price v. Caruso, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79199 (ED MI, July 16, 2009), a Michigan federal magistrate judge recommended that a Jewish prisoner's monetary damage claim under RLUIPA be dismissed on sovereign immunity grounds, even though factual issues remained as to whether RLUIPA was violated by a ban on Jewish prisoners traveling between prison complexes to hold Sabbath services (in order to obtain 10 persons for a minyan).

In Burns v. Smith, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79525 (WD LA, July 16, 2009), a Louisiana federal magistrate judge refused to dismiss free exercise and RLUIPA claims by a pre-trial detainee challenging a detention center's apparent policy of withholding church services to detainees or inmates placed in lockdown for medical reasons.

In Muhammad v. McNeil, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79409 (ND FL, July 6, 2009), a Florida federal magistrate judge recommended dismissal of two claims brought by a Muslim prisoner. Plaintiff sought a strict Halal diet that also took account of his medical needs for a meat-based low-residue diet. He also sought, for religious reasons, access to a dentist (at his family's expense) to remove 16 gold crowns installed in his youth which he says now violate his religious beliefs.

Full post as published by Religion Clause on September 06, 2009 (boomark / email).