Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause

Religion & Law

: Religion Clause

Suit Against Monastery May Proceed Over 1st Amendment Objections

By Howard M. Friedman

Hoyle v. Dimond, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20051 (WD NY, March 9, 2009), is a suit for return of over $1.2 million in assets transferred to the Most Holy Family Monastery by Eric Hoyle who entered the monastery to become a Benedictine monk. The amended complaint which this decision permitted to be filed raises ten causes of action, including fraud, misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, deceptive trade practices and RICO violations. It also seeks an accounting. The dispute arose when Hoyle learned that the monastery was not affiliated with the Order of St. Benedict. At that time he withdrew and demanded back his worldly assets that he had turned over to the monastery.

In this decision, a New York federal district court rejected the monastery's First Amendment defense that adjudicating the claim would involve the court in interpreting religious doctrine. While leaving open the possibility that the defense could be raised again later, the court concluded that for now it appeared that it was merely being asked to determine the neutral fact of whether the Monastery was affiliated with the recognized Order of St. Benedict, and not a religious dispute of whether defendants can be "Benedictines" without being affiliated with the recognized order.

Full post as published by Religion Clause on March 17, 2009 (boomark / email).