Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectSay what? To allow a vote would be discriminatory?
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
OneNewsNow: "'The people of [the District of Columbia] certainly have the right to retain the traditional definition of marriage,' says the [Brian Raum], 'but the board has decided to squelch that right -- and we will be filing an appeal with the DC Superior Court on behalf of the proponents of the referendum.'"Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on June 17, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

VOTE, VOTe, VOte, Vote, vote, votE, voTE, vOTE, VOTE...
The Less Discriminatory (But Still Discriminatory) Alternative
Is the 7th Circuit Backing Off of its Discriminatory Solicitation Rule
ECJ Prohibits Sweeping Discriminatory Statements in Employment
Senate Passes Ledbetter Fair Pay Act








