Home -> Law Blog Directory -> State Courts Blogs -> Law Library Letter

State Courts

: Law Library Letter

Summary 2008 WY 106

Summary of Decision issued September 8, 2008

Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.

Case Name: Wolfe v. Largent

Citation: 2008 WY 106

Docket Number: S-07-0259

Appeal from the District Court of Natrona County, the Honorable W. Thomas Sullins, Judge.

Representing Appellant: Larry W. Harrington, Harrington Law Firm, PC, Casper, Wyoming.

Representing Appellee: William D. Hjelmstad, Casper, Wyoming.

Facts/Discussion: Wolfe and Largent divorced in Washington. Subsequently, Largent moved to Wyoming. Wolfe registered the divorce decree in Wyoming in an effort to collect back child support. Largent did not contest the validity or enforcement of the decree and the district court entered a default judgment in Wolfe?s favor. Largent moved to set aside the judgment and the district court granted the motion. The court ultimately denied confirmation and enforcement of the divorce decree. Wolfe challenged the district court?s order setting aside the default judgment and the district court?s decision to deny confirmation and enforcement of the decree.
Because Largent did not request a hearing to contest the validity or enforcement of the registered order within 20 days of personal service, that order was confirmed by operation of law. Largent sought relief from the default judgment pursuant to W.R.C.P. 55(c) and 60(b). According to the W.R.C.P. 1, the district court had jurisdiction to determine Largent?s motion to set aside the default judgment. The trial court concluded at the hearing that any prejudice to Wolfe was nominal noting that it was an action to collect arrearages where the children were long ago emancipated. Wolfe failed to demonstrate and had not alleged that her ability to litigate the case was compromised between the time the default judgment was entered and the hearing on the merits. The Court found no error in the district court?s determination that Wolfe was not prejudiced by vacation of the default judgment.
Largent asserted several defenses, including that the amount of arrearages claimed were incorrect. The evidentiary record supported the district court?s conclusion that Largent demonstrated a meritorious defense.
Wolfe?s bare assertion that the district court incorrectly found Largent?s negligence non-culpable was insufficient to convince the Court that the district court erred in setting aside the default judgment.
Wolfe contended that the district court erred in failing to enter an order determining the proper amount of arrearages and interest after providing Largent with credit for all payments made. Largent did not contest the validity of the divorce decree instead he asserted that the amount claimed was incorrect. The district court determined that the total support obligation requested was not proper and denied confirmation and enforcement of the divorce decree in its entirety. The Court stated that the decision was not reasonable under the circumstances. On remand, the district court must determine the proper amount of arrearages still owed. After deducting any amounts that cannot be collected due to the applicable statute of limitations, the district court must calculate interest due on the remaining amount and enter an appropriate order confirming and enforcing the Washington divorce decree.

Holding: The Court found no error in the district court?s decision to set aside the default judgment. However, it concluded that the district court erred in its decision to deny confirmation and enforcement of the decree. It reversed the Order Denying Motion for Confirmation and Enforcement of Child Support Order and Arrearages and remanded.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

J. Burke delivered the decision.

Link: http://tinyurl.com/5zj887 .

[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. Please note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you pinpoint cite to a quote, you should cite to this paragraph number rather than to any page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.]

Full post as published by Law Library Letter on September 08, 2008 (boomark / email).