Home -> Law Blog Directory -> State Courts Blogs -> Law Library Letter
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
State Courts
: Law Library LetterSummary 2009 WY 152
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.
Case Name: Wallace v. State
Citation: 2009 WY 152
Docket Number: S-09-0060
Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable Michael N. Deegan, Judge.
Representing Wallace: Diane Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina Kerin, Appellate Counsel; and Kirk A. Morgan, Senior Assistant Appellate Counsel, Wyoming Public Defender Program.
Representing State: Bruce A. Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. Michael Pauling, Senio0r Assistant Attorney General; and Graham M. Smith, Assistant Attorney General.
Facts/Discussion: Wallace appealed the district court?s finding that a deputy did not lack reasonable suspicion to detain him and his vehicle for a dog sniff. Wallace contended that the deputy impermissibly expanded the scope of an otherwise lawful stop by requesting the narcotic detection dog.
The Court may sustain a decision of the lower court on any basis found in the record. Although the district court found reasonable suspicion in the case, the Court affirmed on the basis argued by the State that the initial stop was not prolonged beyond the time reasonably required by the officer to write the citations and that an exterior dog sniff does not constitute a search. As the Court noted in Lindsay v. State, the basis for and the circumstances surrounding the stop rather than an arbitrary time limit govern a stop?s permissible length. The district court concluded that the detention lasted no longer than was necessary to achieve the purpose of the stop inasmuch as the sniff was concluded before the deputy had finished issuing the citations.
Conclusion: The Court held that the initial stop was not prolonged by the exterior dog sniff.
Affirmed.
J. Hill delivered the decision.
Link: http://tinyurl.com/y9ky4sj.
[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. Please note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you pinpoint cite to a quote, you should cite to this paragraph number rather than to any page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.]
Full post as published by Law Library Letter on December 18, 2009 (boomark / email).

Summary Judgment Ruling Published in Abbott v. Centocor
Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness Denied
Improving Your Motions for Summary Judgment
Motion for Summary Judgment as to Willfulness Claims and Invalidity Denied
OCTOBER 2009 COA Case Summary Report (Published Decisions)
Summary of Results for Canadian PhD Programs in 2009 PGR







