Home -> Law Blog Directory -> State Courts Blogs -> Law Library Letter

State Courts

: Law Library Letter

Summary 2009 WY 90

Summary of Decision issued July 10, 2009

Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.

Case Name: White v. State, ex rel., WYDOT

Citation: 2009 WY 90

Docket Number: S-08-0224

Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County, the Honorable Michael K. Davis, Judge.

Representing White: Bernard Q. Phelan, Phelan Law Offices, Cheyenne, Wyoming

Representing State: Bruce A. Salzburg, Attorney General; Theodore Racines, Senior Assistant Attorney General.

Facts/Discussion: White and Kenney challenged the district court?s order dismissing their complaint pursuant to W.R.C.P. 37(b)(2) as a sanction for their failure to comply with two orders compelling discovery.
A party served with discovery requests must respond within 30 days of service unless that party objects or moves for a protective order. It was undisputed that Appellants did not respond to discovery requests within the requisite period and did not respond at all to some of the requests. It is also undisputed that Appellants never filed any objection or motion for a protective order. Despite the district court?s warnings Appellants failed to comply. In the instant case, the district court did not abuse its discretion.
Additionally, Appellants contended the Court should find per se abuse of discretion because the district court vacated the trial and stated that a new date would not be set until Appellants paid the costs imposed as a sanction. The Court has expressly held that there is no violation of art. 1, § 8 of the Wyoming Constitution when a district court orders a trial postponed until sanctions are paid.

Conclusion: Appellants were provided with ample opportunity to comply with the Court?s order prior to dismissal. Appellants implied throughout their brief that the discovery requests were unduly burdensome and overbroad. They could have objected to the requests or moved for a protective order. Failure or refusal to comply was not an alternative available under the rules.

Affirmed.

J. Burke delivered the decision.

Link: http://tinyurl.com/ox6es9 .

[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. Please note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you pinpoint cite to a quote, you should cite to this paragraph number rather than to any page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.]

Full post as published by Law Library Letter on July 13, 2009 (boomark / email).