Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Trademark Law Blogs -> Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Trademark Law
: Las Vegas Trademark AttorneyA ?Kool? False Advertising Lawsuit
By Ryan Gile
The Name Vault is the current owner of the intellectual property belonging to the group ?Kool and the Gang? which was first formed in the 1960s by George Brown, Dennis Thomas, Ronald Bell (n/k/a Khalis Bayyan), Robert ?Kool? Bell, and the late Claydes Charles Smith and best known for its musical hits ?Celebration? ?Get Down On It? and ?Ladies Night?. Among The Name Vault?s trademark asserts are federal trademark registrations for KOOL AND THE GANG (word mark) and KOOL AND THE GANG (and Design) ? both covering entertainment services in the nature of live performances by a musical group and series of musical sound recording. Gang Touring is the operating company that handles the day-to-day operations of the group and uses the The Name Vault?s intellectual property under license. Both companies are owned by the four surviving original founding members (George Brown, Dennis Thomas, Khalis Bayyan, and Robert Bell)
According to the complaint, Martin joined the group in 1987 as a trumpet player and vocalist. Martin served as a trumpet player and vocalist periodically for the group from 1987 to 1995 and again from 2000 until 2007. The complaint notes that Martin has never been the lead singer, lead vocalist, or frontman for the group.
This last fact is critical because according to the complaint, sometime in December 2008, the Venetian began promoting a New Year?s Eve concert appearance by Martin ? billing Martin as the ?former lead singer of Kool & the Gang.? Specifically, the ad (viewable here) reads:
Immediately following Fergie?s high-energy performance, Grammy Award-winning artist Skip Martin, former lead singer of ?Kool & the Gang,? will take the stage at 10:45 p.m. and perform hit songs like ?Celebration? and ?Ladies Night.?
Plaintiffs sent the Defendants a cease and desist letter on December 11, 2008, warning that Plaintiffs would take legal action if the Defendants did not stop their infringing conduct by December 18, 2008. The Defendants refused to pull the ad, and so Plaintiffs filed suit.
Plaintiffs causes of action are for false advertising under 15 U.S.C. §1125(a) as well as common law false advertising and unfair competition.
Full post as published by Las Vegas Trademark Attorney on December 29, 2008 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
Construction Site Accidents
Lawsuits related to accidents
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Linked to Eye Infection Fusarium Keratiti
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
Convicted Caretakers
Senior care center agrees to $175,000 settlement in false advertising lawsuit.
Kimkins
alleging false advertising of online dieting.
Comcast Corp.
alleging false advertising related to the speed of its Internet service.
Activision
alleging false advertising of games for Nintendo Wii, that do not support Dolby Pro Logic II surround sound.
Airborne Settlement
Company agrees to pay consumers $23.3 million class action settlement for false advertising.
Food/Supplements
involving food poisoning, food product recalls, false advertising or labeling, vitamin, weight loss and diet supplement issues.

Airborne Settles False Advertising Lawsuit for $23.3 Million
"Drink the Kool-Aid; Join the Cult":
Article on Peer Promotions and False Advertising Law
$23.3M Settlement in Airborne False Ad Suit
California Appellate Court Dismisses Lawsuit Against Attorney










