ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Indiana Blogs -> Indiana Barrister

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Indiana

: Indiana Barrister

The People v. David Bisard

By Abdul Hakim-Shabazz

ADVERTISEMENTS

For the past few days I’ve been trying to get my arms around the decision by the Indianapolis Fraternal Order of Police to pay for the legal defense of David Bisard.    We all know the story, Bisard is accused of reckless homicide for killing one motorist and injuring two others back in August.   Although he did not show any signs of intoxication at the scene, it was later discovered his blood alcohol content level was 0.19.

FOP President Bill Owensby says the organization voted to defend Bisard because he’s entitled to due process.  When asked about the BAC test Owensby said it didn’t come up in discussions and had Bisard been charged with OWI, he would not have received representation.  He pointed to the city’s report of the Bisard case that noted more than five dozen witnesses did not notice any sign of impairment by Bisard.  He then went on to say the FOP is not defending Bisard’s actions, but making sure he has due process.

I understand the point of the FOP, like any professional organization, is to defend its members who are accused of wrongdoing in the course of their duties.  But I can’t understand for the life of me why the FOP would want to take on something this toxic, particularly when the organization has a choice.

The FOP did not defend officer Candi Perry who was accused last year of  concealing information regarding a homicide.  Perry was later exonerated.  The FOP did defend Jerry Piland who was accused of using excessive force against Brandon Johnson.  I can understand the Piland decision because there was an issue about whether the force was excessive, but David Bisard, I can’t grasp.  Yes, everyone is entitled to due process, but that doesn’t mean you have to foot the bill for their day in court.

In addition, in the back and forth public relations war between the FOP and Public Safety Director Frank Straub, the defense of Bisard doesn’t score any points in the eyes of the public.   Owensby did tell me that the membership could come together and vote to revoke Bisard’s representation.  No word yet on whether that will happen.

You can hear my entire 12-minute interview with Owensby from this morning by clicking below.

Bill Owensby Interview

Full post as published by Indiana Barrister on December 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/03/26 01:08:13)